There's a new international survey on Internet security and trust, of "23,376 Internet users in 24 countries," including "Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Poland, South Africa, South Korea, Sweden, Tunisia, Turkey and the United States." Amongst the findings, 60% of Internet users have heard of Edward Snowden, and 39% of those "have taken steps to protect their online privacy and security as a result of his revelations."
The press is mostly spinning this as evidence that Snowden has not had an effect: "merely 39%," "only 39%," and so on. (Note that these articles are completely misunderstanding the data. It's not 39% of people who are taking steps to protect their privacy post-Snowden, it's 39% of the 60% of Internet users -- which is not everybody -- who have heard of him. So it's much less than 39%.)
Even so, I disagree with the "Edward Snowden Revelations Not Having Much Impact on Internet Users" headline. He's having an enormous impact. I ran the actual numbers country by country, combining data on Internet penetration with data from this survey. Multiplying everything out, I calculate that 706 million people have changed their behavior on the Internet because of what the NSA and GCHQ are doing. (For example, 17% of Indonesians use the Internet, 64% of them have heard of Snowden and 62% of them have taken steps to protect their privacy, which equals 17 million people out of its total 250-million population.)
Note that the countries in this survey only cover 4.7 billion out of a total 7 billion world population. Taking the conservative estimates that 20% of the remaining population uses the Internet, 40% of them have heard of Snowden, and 25% of those have done something about it, that's an additional 46 million people around the world.
It's probably true that most of those people took steps that didn't make any appreciable difference against an NSA level of surveillance, and probably not even against the even more pervasive corporate variety of surveillance. It's probably even true that some of those people didn't take steps at all, and just wish they did or wish they knew what to do. But it is absolutely extraordinary that 750 million people are disturbed enough about their online privacy that they will represent to a survey taker that they did something about it.
Name another news story that has caused over ten percent of the world's population to change their behavior in the past year? Cory Doctorow is right: we have reached "peak indifference to surveillance." From now on, this issue is going to matter more and more, and policymakers around the world need to start paying attention.
Related: a recent Pew Research Internet Project survey on Americans' perceptions of privacy, commented on by Ben Wittes.
This essay previously appeared on Lawfare.
Monday, December 29, 2014
12 Step Security Program - BE SAFE
Good security advice can be hard to find. Lots of security experts
offer help, but not all of their tips are accurate or up-to-date, and many
address PC security only. So even if you follow their advice, you may be more
vulnerable than you think. That's where we come in. We've assembled a dozen
simple but essential tips--a 12-step security program--to keep your PC,
smartphone, gadgets, and identity safe. The steps are practical and fairly easy
to perform, so you can strengthen your security without losing your mind in the
process.
1. Use virtual credit card numbers to shop
onlineYou have good reason to be nervous when using your credit card number to shop online. After all, you may know little or nothing about the company you're buying from, and your credit card information is at risk of being compromised in a data breach. Using a virtual credit card number is one way to make your Internet shopping excursions more secure.
Essentially a wrapper for your regular credit card or debit card account, a virtual card number is good for one use only. When you use the virtual number, the bank that supplied it charges your purchase to your regular credit or debit card, but hackers never gain access to the underlying credit card information.
Various financial institutions maintain some sort of virtual credit card program. Bank of America, for instance, offers a ShopSafe service, and Discover has a similar service built around what it calls a Secure Online Account Number. Check with your bank or card issuer to see what options are available. Alternatively, consider Shop Shield, a virtual card number service that you can use with any credit card or checking account.
2. Secure your Wi-Fi
Is your Wi-Fi network at home password-protected? If not, it should be. You might not care if your neighbors use your Wi-Fi connection to surf the Web, but someone with more sinister motives could take advantage of your generosity (and lack of protection) to gain access to data stored on your home PCs.
The easiest way to guard against Wi-Fi interlopers is to encrypt your Wi-Fi network. Afterward you'll have to enter a password whenever you connect to your Wi-Fi network, but that's a small price to pay for improved security. Most Wi-Fi routers support WEP, WPA, and WPA2 encryption standards. Be sure to use either the WPA or WPA2 encryption settings, which provide a much higher level of security than WEP encryption.
Another safeguard is to set your router not to broadcast the SSID (your network's name).
With SSID broadcasting disabled, your wireless network won't be visible to computers nearby, and only people who specifically know your network's name will be able to find it. The procedure for locking down your Wi-Fi will vary depending on your router's model and manufacturer. Check the router's documentation for instructions.
3 Encrypt Your Hard Drives
Hard drives and USB flash drives are treasure troves of personal
data. They're also among the most common sources of data leaks. If you lose a
flash drive, external hard drive, or laptop containing sensitive personal
information, you will be at risk. Fortunately, encrypting your hard drive can
give your data an extra layer of protection beyond setting up a system
password. Encryption will conceal your drive's data and make accessing the
files almost impossible for anyone who does not know your encryption
password.
The Ultimate and Business editions of Windows 7 and Vista come
with BitLocker, a tool that lets you encrypt your entire hard drive. If you
don't have the Ultimate or Business version, another alternative is to use TrueCrypt,
a free, open-source tool that can encrypt your entire disk, a portion of a
disk, or an external drive. For its part, Mac OS X includes FileVault, a tool
for encrypting your Mac's home folder; Lion, the next major Mac OS X release on
the horizon, will be able to encrypt a whole hard drive.
Another option is to buy external hard drives and flash drives
equipped with encryption tools. Some of these drives have built-in
fingerprint readers for additional security. See "Secure Flash Drives Lock Down Your Data"
for more about secure flash-drive options.
4. Keep Your Software Up-to-Date
One of the simplest but most important security precautions you
should take is to keep your PC's software up-to-date. I'm not talking
exclusively about Windows here: Adobe, Apple, Mozilla, and other software
makers periodically release fixes for various bugs and security flaws.
Cybercriminals commonly exploit known vulnerabilities, and Adobe Reader is a
constant target of such assaults.
Not infrequently, the latest version of a popular program
introduces entirely new security features. For example, Adobe Reader X, the
newest version of the company's PDF reader, uses something called Protected
Mode to shut down malware attacks. If you still use an earlier version of Adobe
Reader, you aren't benefiting from Reader X's security enhancements.
Most major commercial software packages come with some sort of
automatic updating feature that will inform you when a new update is available.
Don't ignore these messages; install updates as soon as you can when you're
prompted to do so. It's a little bit of a hassle, but it can prevent major
headaches later on.
5. Upgrade to the latest antivirus softwareIf you're running antivirus software from two or three years ago, you should upgrade to the most recent version, even if you still receive up-to-date malware signature files for the older edition. The underlying technology for antivirus software has improved significantly in recent years.
To detect threats,
antivirus products today don't rely solely on the traditional signature files
(regularly updated files that identify the latest malware). They also use
heuristic techniques to detect and block infections that no one has seen yet.
Given how frequently new viruses crop up in the wild, the ability to protect
against unknown malware is critical.
6. Lock down your smartphoneIf you use your smartphone the way I use mine, your handset probably contains lots of personal information--e-mail addresses, photos, phone contacts, Facebook and Twitter apps, and the like. That accumulation of valuable data makes smartphones a tempting target for thieves and cybercriminals, which is why the smartphone is shaping up as the next big security battleground.
Android phones are already being hit with Trojan horses and other
types of malware, and security experts agree that mobile malware is still in
its infancy. Worse, many users don't think of their phones as computers (though
that's what the devices are), so they don't take the same security precautions
they would with a PC. If you haven't downloaded a security app for your Android
phone, you should. Most smartphone security apps are free, and it's far better
to have one and never need it than to get caught off-guard and exposed without
one.
If you have an Android phone, the first app you should install on
it is an antivirus program. Besides scanning for malware, mobile antivirus apps
may support such features as a remote wipe (so you can securely remove all data
stored on the phone if you lose it), GPS tracking (for locating your phone if
you misplace it), and SMS spam blocking.
Our favorite freebie in this category is the Lookout Mobile Security app. Lookout scans
your phone for existing malware threats and automatically scans any new
applications you install on your handset. Other popular antivirus apps,
available for a subscription fee, are Symantec's Norton Mobile Security (beta version), AVG's Antivirus
Pro, and McAfee's WaveSecure.
Because Apple's App Store takes a more restrictive approach to
apps offered for sale there, iPhone owners generally don't have to worry as
much about malware, though it's always possible for something to slip through
the cracks. Apple hasn't allowed any proper antivirus applications into the App
Store, either, but you do have some security options.
One is a device tracking and remote-wipe service from Apple called
Find My iPhone. It comes as part of Apple's paid MobileMe
service ($99 per year), but Apple also offers it to any iPhone,
iPad, or iPod Touch owner, free of charge. With Find My iPhone, you can lock
and remotely delete data stored on your iPhone, track the device via GPS,
remotely set a passcode, and display an on-screen message with an alarm sound
(so you can find it if you misplace it around your house or office).
One more tip: When choosing a mobile antivirus program, it's
safest to stick with well-known brands. Otherwise, you risk getting infected by
malware disguised as an antivirus app.7. Install a link-checker plug-in
Security threats may lurk in seemingly innocuous Web pages. Legitimate sites may get hacked, cybercriminals game search engines to make sure that their infected pages come up in searches for hot topics (a technique known as "search engine poisoning"), and seemingly safe sites may harbor malware. Although you have no way to guard against these attacks completely, using a link checker can help protect you from many of them.
Link-checker tools
typically show small badges next to links in search results and elsewhere to
indicate whether a site is trustworthy, dangerous, or questionable. Many such
tools also add a status indicator to your browser's toolbar to signal the
presence of any problems with the site that you're currently visiting.
Various options are
available: AVG
LinkScanner, McAfee SiteAdvisor, Symantec
Norton Safe Web Lite, and Web of Trust are all available for free. Many
security suites come with a link scanner, too.8. Don't neglect physical security
A thief can snatch an unattended laptop from a desk and walk away in a matter of seconds. And a thief who has your laptop may have access to your files and personal information. A notebook lock won't prevent someone from cutting the cable, but it can deter crimes of opportunity.
Kensington is probably best-known for its notebook locks; it
offers an array of locks for laptops and desktops. Targus is a
second vendor that specializes in laptop security gear, including one lock that
sounds an alarm when someone tries to pick up the attached laptop or cut the
lock cable.
Prying eyes are a common security hazard. To prevent unauthorized
viewing of your data when you step away from your desk, always lock your screen
before leaving your PC unattended. To do this, simply hold down the Windows key
and type the letter L. This will bring up the lock screen. To get back to work,
press Ctrl-Alt-Delete, and enter your login password at the prompt.
Another way to shield your screen is to install a privacy filter
over the display. These filters fit directly on a monitor so other people can't
peer over your shoulder and see what's on the screen. A privacy filter may be
particularly useful if you work in an "open" office that lacks
cubicle walls. Various companies sell these filters, including Targus, 3M, and Fellowes.
9. Make HTTPS your friendWhen you're browsing the Web, protect yourself by using HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure) whenever possible. HTTPS encrypts the connection between your PC and the Website you're visiting. Though HTTPS doesn't guarantee that a site is secure, it can help prevent other parties from hacking into the network and gaining access to your account.
Many sites use HTTPS by default: When you purchase an item online
or log in to online banking, for instance, your browser will probably connect
to the site via HTTPS automatically. But you can go one step further by
enabling HTTPS on Facebook, Twitter, and Gmail.
To use Facebook's HTTPS feature, log in to Facebook and click
Account in the upper-right corner. Select Account Settings from the drop-down
menu, and look for ‘Account Security' on the resulting page. Under the Account
Security heading, click Change, check the box next to Browse Facebook on a
secure connection (https) whenever possible, and click Save.
For Twitter, first log in to your account. If you're using the new
Twitter interface, click your account name in the upper-right part of the
screen, and select settings. (If you're still using the old Twitter interface,
click the Settings link in the upper right of the window.) From there, scroll
down to the bottom of the resulting page, check the box next to Always use
HTTPS, and click Save.
To enable HTTPS on Gmail, log in to your account, click the gear
icon in the upper-right corner, and select Mail Settings from the drop-down
menu. Next, under the Browser Connection heading, select the button labeled
Always use https. When you're all set, scroll to the bottom of the page and
click Save Changes. To learn more about Gmail security, visit Google's Gmail Security Checklist page.10. Avoid public computers and Wi-Fi
As convenient as free Wi-Fi and publicly available computers may be at, say, a public library or café, using them can leave you and your personal information exposed. Public computers might be infected with spyware and other types of malware designed to track your movements online and harvest your passwords.
The same is true of open Wi-Fi networks. Cyberthieves may set up
rogue Wi-Fi networks that look legitimate (for instance, one may be named for
the café that you're visiting) but enable the crooks to collect your personal
information. Even legitimate open Wi-Fi networks may leave you vulnerable. For
an example, look no further than the Firesheep plug-in for Firefox, which allows
just about anyone to hijack log-in sessions for various social networks.
Sometimes, you may have no choice but to use a public computer or
Wi-Fi network. When you do, don't use it to check your e-mail or social network
accounts, conduct online banking, or perform any other action that entails
logging in to a site. If you have access to a VPN, use it.11. Be password smart
You probably know already that using obvious or easy-to-discover passwords like "password" or your pet's name is a bad idea. But how can you make your passwords significantly more secure?
First, you need to use a different long, strong password for each
account. Hackers often attempt to break into accounts by employing a
"dictionary attack," which involves using words straight from the
dictionary to guess your password. So don't use standard words as your
passwords; instead, try creating them from a combination of letters, numbers,
and symbols. And don't simply replace letters in a word with a symbol (for
example, using the @ symbol in place of an A); it's too common a trick. You can
also strengthen your passwords by using a mix of lowercase and capital letters.
Basically, the more complex a password is, the better. But try to
use something that you'll be able to remember--a mnemonic of some sort that
incorporates various alphanumeric symbols--and that nobody but you would know.
Remembering multiple passwords can be a challenge, which is why
many people find that a good password manager is indispensable. KeePass is a
good, free password-management option that works on Windows and Mac OS X
systems.
12. Check your credit report each yearUnfortunately, even if you do everything right, bad guys might still succeed in stealing your identity. After all, you can control who has access to your personal information, but you can't control how well a company that you do business with secures its personal-data records.
Nevertheless, you can limit the damage that would result from
undetected identity theft by checking your credit report regularly.
Periodically checking your credit report is a good way to make sure that no one
has opened credit card or bank accounts under your name.
If you are a U.S. citizen, you're entitled to receive one free
credit report every 12 months from each of the three major credit
agencies--Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion--via AnnualCreditReport.com. The service will let you examine
and print out your credit report for free, but if you want to obtain your
actual credit score, you'll have to pay for it. Since your freebie credit
report is just a once-a-year affair, it's a good idea to insert a reminder in
your calendar to check in again with AnnualCreditReport.com in 12 months.Thursday, December 18, 2014
Does authority have any limits
The next time you call for assistance because the Internet service in your home is not working, the 'technician' who comes to your door may actually be an undercover government agent. He will have secretly disconnected the service, knowing that you will naturally call for help and -- when he shows up at your door, impersonating a technician -- let him in. He will walk through each room of your house, claiming to diagnose the problem. Actually, he will be videotaping everything (and everyone) inside. He will have no reason to suspect you have broken the law, much less probable cause to obtain a search warrant. But that makes no difference, because by letting him in, you will have 'consented' to an intrusive search of your home."
This chilling scenario is the first paragraph of a motion to suppress evidence gathered by the police in exactly this manner, from a hotel room. Unbelievably, this isn't a story from some totalitarian government on the other side of an ocean. This happened in the United States, and by the FBI. Eventually -- I'm sure there will be appeals -- higher U.S. courts will decide whether this sort of practice is legal. If it is, the county will slide even further into a society where the police have even more unchecked power than they already possess.
The facts are these. In June, Two wealthy Macau residents stayed at Caesar's Palace in Las Vegas. The hotel suspected that they were running an illegal gambling operation out of their room. They enlisted the police and the FBI, but could not provide enough evidence for them to get a warrant. So instead they repeatedly cut the guests' Internet connection. When the guests complained to the hotel, FBI agents wearing hidden cameras and recorders pretended to be Internet repair technicians and convinced the guests to let them in. They filmed and recorded everything under the pretense of fixing the Internet, and then used the information collected from that to get an actual search warrant. To make matters even worse, they lied to the judge about how they got their evidence.
The FBI claims that their actions are no different from any conventional sting operation. For example, an undercover policeman can legitimately look around and report on what he sees when he invited into a suspect's home under the pretext of trying to buy drugs. But there are two very important differences: one of consent, and the other of trust. The former is easier to see in this specific instance, but the latter is much more important for society.
You can't give consent to something you don't know and understand. The FBI agents did not enter the hotel room under the pretext of making an illegal bet. They entered under a false pretext, and relied on that for consent of their true mission. That makes things different. The occupants of the hotel room didn't realize who they were giving access to, and they didn't know their intentions. The FBI knew this would be a problem. According to the New York Times, "a federal prosecutor had initially warned the agents not to use trickery because of the 'consent issue.' In fact, a previous ruse by agents had failed when a person in one of the rooms refused to let them in." Claiming that a person granting an Internet technician access is consenting to a police search makes no sense, and is no different than one of those "click through" Internet license agreements that you didn't read saying one thing and while meaning another. It's not consent in any meaningful sense of the term.
Far more important is the matter of trust. Trust is central to how a society functions. No one, not even the most hardened survivalists who live in backwoods log cabins, can do everything by themselves. Humans need help from each other, and most of us need a lot of help from each other. And that requires trust. Many Americans' homes, for example, are filled with systems that require outside technical expertise when they break: phone, cable, Internet, power, heat, water. Citizens need to trust each other enough to give them access to their hotel rooms, their homes, their cars, their person. Americans simply can't live any other way.
It cannot be that every time someone allows one of those technicians into our homes they are consenting to a police search. Again from the motion to suppress: "Our lives cannot be private -- and our personal relationships intimate -- if each physical connection that links our homes to the outside world doubles as a ready-made excuse for the government to conduct a secret, suspicionless, warrantless search." The resultant breakdown in trust would be catastrophic. People would not be able to get the assistance they need. Legitimate servicemen would find it much harder to do their job. Everyone would suffer.
It all comes back to the warrant. Through warrants, Americans legitimately grant the police an incredible level of access into our personal lives. This is a reasonable choice because the police need this access in order to solve crimes. But to protect ordinary citizens, the law requires the police to go before a neutral third party and convince them that they have a legitimate reason to demand that access. That neutral third party, a judge, then issues the warrant when he or she is convinced. This check on the police's power is for Americans' security, and is an important part of the Constitution.
In recent years, the FBI has been pushing the boundaries of its warrantless investigative powers in disturbing and dangerous ways. It collects phone-call records of millions of innocent people. It uses hacking tools against unknown individuals without warrants. It impersonates legitimate news sites. If the lower court sanctions this particular FBI subterfuge, the matter needs to be taken up -- and reversed -- by the Supreme Court.
This essay previously appeared in The Atlantic.
This chilling scenario is the first paragraph of a motion to suppress evidence gathered by the police in exactly this manner, from a hotel room. Unbelievably, this isn't a story from some totalitarian government on the other side of an ocean. This happened in the United States, and by the FBI. Eventually -- I'm sure there will be appeals -- higher U.S. courts will decide whether this sort of practice is legal. If it is, the county will slide even further into a society where the police have even more unchecked power than they already possess.
The facts are these. In June, Two wealthy Macau residents stayed at Caesar's Palace in Las Vegas. The hotel suspected that they were running an illegal gambling operation out of their room. They enlisted the police and the FBI, but could not provide enough evidence for them to get a warrant. So instead they repeatedly cut the guests' Internet connection. When the guests complained to the hotel, FBI agents wearing hidden cameras and recorders pretended to be Internet repair technicians and convinced the guests to let them in. They filmed and recorded everything under the pretense of fixing the Internet, and then used the information collected from that to get an actual search warrant. To make matters even worse, they lied to the judge about how they got their evidence.
The FBI claims that their actions are no different from any conventional sting operation. For example, an undercover policeman can legitimately look around and report on what he sees when he invited into a suspect's home under the pretext of trying to buy drugs. But there are two very important differences: one of consent, and the other of trust. The former is easier to see in this specific instance, but the latter is much more important for society.
You can't give consent to something you don't know and understand. The FBI agents did not enter the hotel room under the pretext of making an illegal bet. They entered under a false pretext, and relied on that for consent of their true mission. That makes things different. The occupants of the hotel room didn't realize who they were giving access to, and they didn't know their intentions. The FBI knew this would be a problem. According to the New York Times, "a federal prosecutor had initially warned the agents not to use trickery because of the 'consent issue.' In fact, a previous ruse by agents had failed when a person in one of the rooms refused to let them in." Claiming that a person granting an Internet technician access is consenting to a police search makes no sense, and is no different than one of those "click through" Internet license agreements that you didn't read saying one thing and while meaning another. It's not consent in any meaningful sense of the term.
Far more important is the matter of trust. Trust is central to how a society functions. No one, not even the most hardened survivalists who live in backwoods log cabins, can do everything by themselves. Humans need help from each other, and most of us need a lot of help from each other. And that requires trust. Many Americans' homes, for example, are filled with systems that require outside technical expertise when they break: phone, cable, Internet, power, heat, water. Citizens need to trust each other enough to give them access to their hotel rooms, their homes, their cars, their person. Americans simply can't live any other way.
It cannot be that every time someone allows one of those technicians into our homes they are consenting to a police search. Again from the motion to suppress: "Our lives cannot be private -- and our personal relationships intimate -- if each physical connection that links our homes to the outside world doubles as a ready-made excuse for the government to conduct a secret, suspicionless, warrantless search." The resultant breakdown in trust would be catastrophic. People would not be able to get the assistance they need. Legitimate servicemen would find it much harder to do their job. Everyone would suffer.
It all comes back to the warrant. Through warrants, Americans legitimately grant the police an incredible level of access into our personal lives. This is a reasonable choice because the police need this access in order to solve crimes. But to protect ordinary citizens, the law requires the police to go before a neutral third party and convince them that they have a legitimate reason to demand that access. That neutral third party, a judge, then issues the warrant when he or she is convinced. This check on the police's power is for Americans' security, and is an important part of the Constitution.
In recent years, the FBI has been pushing the boundaries of its warrantless investigative powers in disturbing and dangerous ways. It collects phone-call records of millions of innocent people. It uses hacking tools against unknown individuals without warrants. It impersonates legitimate news sites. If the lower court sanctions this particular FBI subterfuge, the matter needs to be taken up -- and reversed -- by the Supreme Court.
This essay previously appeared in The Atlantic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Protecting Your Business From Your Remote Employees
A significant portion of your workforce is currently moving to perform full- or part-time remote work as a result of COVID-19. As you modif...
-
Home Depot said today that cyber criminals armed with custom-built malware stole an estimated 56 million debit and credit card numbers fro...
-
Nearly every day is some kind of holiday or special observance at the local, state or national level. Some days are assigned to multiple ca...